KhanhDam Posted August 20, 2022 Share Posted August 20, 2022 what is fastest/easiest way to take visual , ir & uv images of same subject? I'm guessing 3 different drop in filters, though some kind of filter slider or filter turret would be cool as well, if not a little bulky. Link to comment
dabateman Posted August 20, 2022 Share Posted August 20, 2022 Well with my Sigma SD14 and Foveon sensor, I can get simultaneously images of UV (monochrome on top blue layer), UV induced visible fluorescence on middle green layer, and UV induced IR fluorescence on lower red layer of the sensor. You just need software to tease it out. But I don't think that is what you were asking. A front matched filter wheel, would be fastest, spinning through the various filters. I have tried that with a cheap Astrophotography 9 poert filter wheel and 1.25 inch filters. Works ok with a cropped sensor of a micro four thirds camera and a telephoto lens. Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted August 20, 2022 Share Posted August 20, 2022 Yeah. I tried a stereo attachment once and posted the results here but taking simultaneous UV and IR photos requires very different exposures for the two sides and the quality sucked. I have mostly given up on that idea. Link to comment
Nate Posted August 20, 2022 Share Posted August 20, 2022 I've put 2 cameras on a 200mm quick release plate, one on a ball head to make it higher and mounted my phone on the hot shoe of one of them for UV/vis/NIR. Used my video head and astro tripod. Looked pretty ghettoish, so never used it. Just an idea. Link to comment
Yves W Posted August 20, 2022 Share Posted August 20, 2022 For successive shots, the Manfrotto Xume system with magnets Link to comment
ulf Posted August 20, 2022 Share Posted August 20, 2022 1 hour ago, Yves W said: For successive shots, the Manfrotto Xume system with magnets That is also my favourite system. Filter changing is very fast and efficient. Link to comment
KhanhDam Posted August 21, 2022 Author Share Posted August 21, 2022 12 hours ago, Andy Perrin said: Yeah. I tried a stereo attachment once and posted the results here but taking simultaneous UV and IR photos requires very different exposures for the two sides and the quality sucked. I have mostly given up on that idea. maybe you just need a stronger IR filter to block out more light and incrase the IR exposure. I've only seen 1000nm filters, nothing stronger though. Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted August 21, 2022 Share Posted August 21, 2022 The wavelength isn’t the issue, it’s the glass thickness. Yes, it could be done if proper thicknesses were available and carefully chosen. However there were also other issues, my stereo adapter was very filthy and it degraded the image quality. I couldn’t figure out how to disassemble it to clean it up. Link to comment
Kai Posted August 21, 2022 Share Posted August 21, 2022 Good question... In addition to moving the filters, the exposure settings and white balance also have to be adjusted! For bee-view images I actually use two Canon 6D cameras, one FS modified for UV and one unmodified for RGB. Each with an EF 1:1.8 50mm lens. I then simply change the whole cameras on the tripod. A big slider would make it even easier... Of course, three cameras (plus IR) are also conceivable :) Link to comment
KaJashey Posted August 21, 2022 Share Posted August 21, 2022 After dropping filters on the sidewalk I made a 3d-printed turret for 52mm filters. Six positions. In addition to the filters in the turret itself you can load filters behind it and in the lens hood. The lens hood unscrews with a half a turn and you can have your UV/IR cut in there for your RGB exposures then remove it for your UV & IR exposures. Kinda needs to be redesigned a little deeper for UV filters. Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted August 21, 2022 Share Posted August 21, 2022 The number of methods members have devised to answer this question is incredible. Link to comment
KhanhDam Posted August 25, 2022 Author Share Posted August 25, 2022 UURig RFS ND Filter Rapid Filter System DSLR Camera Accessory Quick Switch Bracket for 58/67/72/77/82mm DSLR Lens Adapter Flip| | - AliExpress $13 each , might cut them up and put 3 hinges on one ring. I really like how simple this is. Link to comment
Yves W Posted August 25, 2022 Share Posted August 25, 2022 For many filters this does not seem easy to handle. My lenses are equipped with Manfrotto Xume adapter as well as my "Lens adapter" filters, it's magnetic, fast and reliable even my Baader U, a dozen of each in 52mm. All my filters are always like this: UV or IVS, Cut IR + adapter filter Xume, no disassembly. +qq adapters available for testing. This product becomes rare, on the link and Aliexpress I see the « Kase system » that takes the magnet technique. I don't know at all and I've had enough. Link to comment
Dmitry Posted August 25, 2022 Share Posted August 25, 2022 Trying to use idea from there https://www.myminifactory.com/object/3d-print-custom-camera-filter-26987 52mm cap have light leaks, 58mm looks better. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 I just screw/unscrew the 3 (or more) different filters from the front of the lens. Years of practice at doing this. But, yes, sometimes I've dropped a filter. ***** Years ago Birna and I discovered that the old Nikon gel filter holder, AF-1, would hold a 52mm filter in the back plate without screwing it in. So you could put screw the UV filter into the front drop-down plate. Then after making the UV photo, drop-down that filter and pop your IR-pass into the back plate. And so forth. This method did sometimes involve the filter falling off the back plate. But it was a fast way to change filters. LINK chosen at random to illustrate the old Nikon AF-1 gel filter holder. NOTE: Sometimes the foam padding on the AF-1 can deteriorate, and it's a mess to remove. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 You know, I can't think of any method of filter changing which does not involve a possible jiggling of the camera/lens. Why can't the inventors come up with a tunable sensor? Then you could just dial in a bandwidth that you wanted to record. That would be soooooooo cool! Link to comment
Dmitry Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 There was Panasonic 3D lens for MFT mount, you may put 2 filters at once somehow. It is possible to create other custom lenses using this idea. Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 There are LCD tunable filters, Andrea! You can indeed dial in a wavelength. They do not go down to UV however. NIR is doable. I did this experiment some time ago with a stereo attachment: Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 They do not go down to UV however. Yes, that is why I want something better. Preferably built-in to the sensor somenow. ********* I spoke to Bernard yesterday, he is doing more visible Anaglyphs. Good to hear! He hasn't been around for a while, so hope to see him back here soon. Link to comment
Yves W Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 I have several Nikon AF-1, Nfoto had offered me one in 2011 when I came to my house. I prefer the Manfrotto Xume system, no problems and no more falling and breakage Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now