Dmitry Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 Gear used: Olympus e-m5 body full spectrum converted myself. Kamlan 50mm F/1.1 (design 5/5). There is also a mk-II lens in 6/8 design, bigger and heavier - don't be confused! processed in xnview from ORF without white balance changes, all filters 2mm Hg lamp: no filters 315nm filter - only 365nm line visible zwb3 Solar (heavy cloudy weather): no filters zwb1 zwb2 zwb3 Lens is 365nm capable Link to comment
Dmitry Posted April 12, 2022 Author Share Posted April 12, 2022 Some jpegs for reference Link to comment
dabateman Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 Since the intensity of the uv is much lower in the zwb3 image than the zwb1 image, that implies to me that you must be really pushing it to get uv through this lens. So 365nm might be possible, but your mostly going to see only the upper 370/380nm to 400nm uv range through this lens. Link to comment
Dmitry Posted April 12, 2022 Author Share Posted April 12, 2022 I don't know how much UV blocked by clouds, maybe it can be better in direct sunlight. But there is no 334nm line from HG lamp. EXIF is saved, you can see exposure was not same. Link to comment
Dmitry Posted April 14, 2022 Author Share Posted April 14, 2022 Same performance on direct sunlight. Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 It does sound like the lens is cutting it off below 365nm. Link to comment
Dmitry Posted April 14, 2022 Author Share Posted April 14, 2022 There is no lens cement, but coating or glass material can block. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now