Andrea B. Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 Blum, A.G. (2022) Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. (Malvaceae) Tropical Hibiscus. Flower photographed in visible and ultraviolet light. LINK Middletown, New Jersey, USA 24 September 2015 Cultivar Synonyms: Hibiscus arnottii Griff. ex Mast. Hibiscus boryanus DC. Hibiscus cooperi auct. Hibiscus festalis Salisb. Hibiscus liliiflorus Griff. ex Mast. Hibiscus rosiflorus Stokes Hibiscus storckii Seem. Other Common Names Chinese Hibiscus China Rose Hawaiian Hibiscus Comment: I'm going with a general classification of this particular plant as H. rosa-sinensis, but I think it is likely to be some kind of hybrid commonly supplied to garden stores to be sold as short-lived, potted, summer annuals to grow on the porch. This Hibiscus was interesting to photograph in UV because it is very UV-reflective. Most red flowers I have photographed are UV-absorbing. Gear[ D600-conversion + UV-Nikkor 105/4.5 + Sunlight ] Visible[ f/11 for 1/30" @ ISO-200 :: Baader UVIR-Cut Filter ] As I wrote elsewhere: This flower is scorching red! UV[ f/11 for 15" @ ISO-200 :: BaaderU UV-Pass Filter ] Not only is this Hibiscus UV-reflective, it shows two false colors. UV+Blue+Green[ f/11 for 1.6" @ ISO-800 :: UG5(1.5mm) + S8612(1.75mm) ] Link to comment
nfoto Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 I only had geese for dinner in my visits to the Czech republic ... Likewise in all other East European countries I've been to over the years. Link to comment
Guest Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 UV+Blue+Green is very cool! Link to comment
dabateman Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 Absolutely beautiful. I think I used to have some of these in my garden, before, they got killed when the bushes were all pulled out for cedar trees. I miss some of the interesting flowers. Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 Very pretty Andrea! Link to comment
colinbm Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Great collection Andrea Link to comment
Wayne Harridge Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Impressive! For a particular species, do the UV "colours" correspond in any way to the visible colours? Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Wayne, to expand on that “no,” you can find examples of species that are all yellow in visible light but have yellow and blue in UV. So there is no 1 to 1 mapping that will work. In fact the above Hibiscus is like that. It’s red everywhere in visible but blue and yellow in UV. So you can’t map red to any particular color in the UV. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted January 18, 2022 Author Share Posted January 18, 2022 I disagree. I know why you both said "no", but that is not an entirely accurate answer. The underlying pigments in a flower and the flower petals' surface structure determine its response to incident Ultraviolet light. But we usually don't have that information about a flower. You would also need to know about a particular flower's bio-chemistry. It is all quite fascinating. Here is a discussion of pigments in Hibiscus: LINK Link to comment
nfoto Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 The Asteraceae offers plenty of examples of yellow flowers that can appear white, yellow, gray, or black in UV. Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Andrea, you must be misinterpreting the question somehow. There is no way to make a table with visible colors in one column and UV colors in the column next to it. Yes, the pigments in the flower do determine these (in addition to structural colors) but some of those pigments may be transparent in visible light and only absorb in UV. It’s always tempting to say, for example, “all yellow flowers with five petals will have a UV bullseye” but we know from experience that this is not the case. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted January 18, 2022 Author Share Posted January 18, 2022 Yes, you could do this if you knew what the pigments were and whether or not they were UV-absorbing or UV-reflecting. Link to comment
nfoto Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 There are too many unknowns at play here. That is why we continue to be surprised when we do a new flower in UV. Fortunately, to my way of thinking. Otherwise all the fun and excitement would have vanished. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted January 18, 2022 Author Share Posted January 18, 2022 For example, there are at least 6 ways for a flower to be yellow: carotenoid, flavenol, anthochlor, carotenoid + yellow flavonoid, quinones, betalain alkaloids (in some Caryophyllineae) Reference: Biochemistry of Plant Pollination J.B. Harborn, 1993 in Intro to Ecological Biochemistry, 4th Ed. But the coloration is much more than just the presence of a pigment. For example, the flower's biochemical processes can alter its color after pollination. (We've had a few examples of this.) Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Andrea, the point is that we do not know what the pigments are OR any of the rest of that. So there is no way to map visible to UV, and it’s known to be not 1-1. So the answer is “no” as Birna said. Another way to say this is: nobody can (even in principle) write a computer program that would take a visible picture of a flower and spit out the corresponding UV photo. You cannot determine the pigments from the color for exactly the reason you pointed out: there are 6 ways to be yellow! Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted January 18, 2022 Author Share Posted January 18, 2022 You cannot determine the pigments from the color......... Uh, Andy, I said nothing about determining the pigments in a flower from its color. I said that IF you knew what the pigments were.... (Go back 4 posts to see that.) We do actually know what the pigments are in many, many flowers. There are a skazillion papers out there which describe exactly that. I've been recently reading Blue Flower Color Development by Anthocyanins Yoshida, More & Kondo, 2008 in Royal Society of Chemistry (If you see a blue flower, you can guess anthocyanin and be right most of the time. But there are a lot of different types of anthocyanins.) Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Andrea, the question was, “For a particular species, do the UV "colours" correspond in any way to the visible colours?” And the answer is no, you cannot turn visible colors into UV colors because some areas of the same flower will show UV colors that do not correspond to the visible ones. Even if you know the pigment (which mostly you don’t) you don’t know its distribution on the flower. How would you have anticipated the UV blue on the hibiscus above? Or where it would appear on the petals? Link to comment
dabateman Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 Also no because it depends on the camera's false UV colors. Are you using Andrea's magic Panasonic s1r with different UV false color pallet or the typically Sony sensor based color pallet? Link to comment
Cadmium Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 Andrea, Beautiful photos! Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted January 21, 2022 Author Share Posted January 21, 2022 Thank you, Cadmium. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted January 21, 2022 Author Share Posted January 21, 2022 David, the S1R is not unusable w.r.t. its false color palette. False yellows and blues still occur. There seems to be more dark green or cyan in foliage. The Hibiscus above was photographed with my old D600-conversion before its oil-flinging got out of hand. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now