Aeonium arboreum

[Fandyus]

Personally, I don't feel there's much "UV" quality to this photo but I decided to post it regardless. The picture is significantly larger than my other images since Birna recently told me I can post images 1-2mb in size.

It was shot with a ZWB2 and a QB39 for purification but it was only illuminated with a 365nm LED. I wanted to take a picture that could be a smartphone wallpaper or such but I don't think the subject ended up looking interesting enough so I released the image for free.

https://www.pexels.com/photo/black-and-white-texture-plant-b-amp-w-10696252/

https://unsplash.com/photos/cNSPk2WKKYQ

[Doug A]

@Fandyus it may not have enough UV personality for you, but it is a fine image. 

Thanks for sharing,

Doug A

 

 

[Andy Perrin]

This image loads so slowly it times out on my Mac. While we may not pay for images, resizing them at least a bit would be nice to those with slower connections.

 

[Fandyus]

4 hours ago, Doug A said:

@Fandyus it may not have enough UV personality for you, but it is a fine image. 

Thanks for sharing,

Doug A

 

 

Thanks!

 

4 hours ago, Andy Perrin said:

This image loads so slowly it times out on my Mac. While we may not pay for images, resizing them at least a bit would be nice to those with slower connections.

 

Sorry for that, the total size is around 600kb, I thought that was compressed enough for most uses. You can view the image in one of the links in the post if you want.

[Guest]

How do these succulents respond to other visualizations such as fluorescence?

[Cadmium]

Those bloom at some point in the year, so maybe you can take a photo when it is blooming, and their may be more color with that.

[dabateman]

Loads fine and fast on my S8 phone. 

Looks like little trees to me. I like the details in the trunk. 

[Andy Perrin]

It loads fine on my phone also. It seems to be a problem mainly with the desktop. If it doesn’t load in a certain time, Safari stops the download. 

[nfoto]

Then perhaps the culprit is Safari itself? I'm on Firefox and the image loads instanly with the web page. This either from desktop or mobile phone.

[Andy Perrin]

Sort of? As I said, I think if the file is too large, it cuts off the download rather than display the whole thing. However, I will say I’m having trouble reproducing the issue now. It may have been cached. 

[Fandyus]

15 hours ago, Blazer0ne said:

How do these succulents respond to other visualizations such as fluorescence?

I could try some IR fluorescence perhaps. Visible is out of the question due to the tons of fluorescent fibers that have ingrained themselves into the surface of the plant. I can't even blow them off.

[Fandyus]

14 hours ago, Cadmium said:

Those bloom at some point in the year, so maybe you can take a photo when it is blooming, and their may be more color with that.

I'll might try if that happens. But I don't remember this particualar specimen blooming truth be told.

[Fandyus]

11 hours ago, dabateman said:

Loads fine and fast on my S8 phone. 

Looks like little trees to me. I like the details in the trunk. 

Thanks. Luminar 4's structure boost function helped a lot there. Didn't even introduce any halos or other such artifacts.

[Guest]

1 hour ago, Fandyus said:

I could try some IR fluorescence perhaps. Visible is out of the question due to the tons of fluorescent fibers that have ingrained themselves into the surface of the plant. I can't even blow them off.

 

I didn't consider that but it is so true. Most of my outdoor plants are spoiled by synthetic dust fibers within a day after I bring them inside.

[Fandyus]

6 hours ago, Blazer0ne said:

 

I didn't consider that but it is so true. Most of my outdoor plants are spoiled by synthetic dust fibers within a day after I bring them inside.

It's a real pain. I would shoot way more UVIVF if it wasn't for that.