Cadmium Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 3 photo stitched pano. Infrared 850nm (Schott RG850). Finley Wildlife Refuge. Interesting clouds. Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 The Woods Effect can be the title! Link to comment
Stefano Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 Those clouds are so complex, I'm sure IR helped a lot to make them clearly visible by cutting away the haze. IR and clouds work well together. Link to comment
Nate Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 Super cool! I find myself shooting the sky in IR and changing my desktop pic with it weekly. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 IR clouds are one of my favorite things! Link to comment
photoni Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 Cadmium ... WOW I love IR landscapes I have a very uncomfortable and delicate 87c ~ 800nm jelly Wratten, I thought I would get a glass 850 like yours. I wonder what the more extreme ones do more than 900 ... maybe nothing? Link to comment
dabateman Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 39 minutes ago, photoni said: Cadmium ... WOW I love IR landscapes I have a very uncomfortable and delicate 87c ~ 800nm jelly Wratten, I thought I would get a glass 850 like yours. I wonder what the more extreme ones do more than 900 ... maybe nothing? On a digital sensor, everything above 850nm is monochrome. All dyes absorb about the same. But 980bp10 is fun for dark water as Andy first showed. Link to comment
Cadmium Posted November 12, 2021 Author Share Posted November 12, 2021 Thanks everyone. Yes, as far as I have seen, the main thing that is different with higher than 850nm filters is the way water looks slightly darker, even then I have stacked it with something that blocks most of the IR range. but I don't use anything above 850nm hardly ever, so I don't know. I prefer 850nm for black and white landscapes, but you can desaturate any IR. The 850nm is best for that though. The sky in this one is really complex and interesting to me. Added: And, anything above 850nm is going to require a lot more exposure time. Stick with 850nm I say. Link to comment
Doug A Posted December 8, 2021 Share Posted December 8, 2021 Awesome IR pano landscape. Clouds are amazing. Thanks for sharing, Doug A Link to comment
photoni Posted December 9, 2021 Share Posted December 9, 2021 On 11/12/2021 at 6:45 AM, Cadmium said: nything above 850nm is going to require a lot more exposure time. Stick with 850nm I say. Cadmium... Dave ... Thanks yes i often use RED 590nm which i can make false colors. I bought two Ø52 filters an orange Nikon O56 (? Nm) and a Hoya R72 (750nm?) We hope that the sun will come back, these days it is snowing all over northern Italy Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now