bvf Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 I took advantage of the long winter nights to do some fluorescence photography. Here are some results of UV- and Visible-Induced IR fluorescence, done in tri-colour. I’ve also included standard visible and a few UVIVF images for comparison. (There are some more tri-colour IR Fluorescence images, using rock samples at https://www.ultravio...__fromsearch__1 ) The Tricolour channel assignments are: Red Channel: 1000nmGreen Channel: 850nm Blue Channel: 750nm Light Sources:UV: Nemo Torch Visible: Lumitact LED torch. Narrower-band Excitation My available UV light sources and filters did not allow for excitation using a narrower band of the UV spectrum, but this was possible using visible light. This set of images includes Visible-Induced IR Fluorescence excited by white, blue (470nm), green (520nm), and red (635nm). Apart from colour cast, there is not a lot of difference, and so all later Visible-induced IR Flourescence images use just white excitation. The blue and red colour casts on the blue- and red-excited images cannot be due to any form of blue or red visible light leak: blue and red in the image is caused by transmission through 750nm and 1000nm bandpass filters and there is no reason why blue light would leak only through the 750nm filter and red light would leak only through the 1000nm filter. Orchid: Visible..........................................................................UV-Induced Visible Fluorescence UV-Induced IR Fluorescence Visible (White)-induced IR Fluorecence......................Visible (Blue)-induced IR Fluorescence Visible (Green)-induced IR Fluorecence.....................Visible (Red)-induced IR Fluorescence White Balancing How do you white balance images like this? I started off with using WB based on a white section of a rock, but this often just gave visually uninteresting so I started WBing against elements of the image. This example shows the differences this can produce. Lily Visible....................................................................................................................UV-Induced Visible Fluorescence Visible-Induced IR Fluorescence: Rock WB method:..................................................................................................WB against dark area at top-left: WB against leaf: UV-Induced IR Fluorescence: WB against leaf: Forsythia: Visible: UV-Induced IR Fluorescence:................................................................................Visible-Induced IR Fluorescence: Flaming Katy: Visible:..................................................................................................................UV-Induced Visible Fluorescence: UV-Induced IR Fluorescence:...............................................................................Visible-Induced IR Fluorescence: For both of these images, saturation has been increased and WB was against the leaf. Winter Aconite: Visible: UV-Induced IR Fluorescence:...............................................................................Visible-Induced IR Fluorescence: Chrysanthemum: Visible: UV-Induced IR Fluorescence:.................................................................................Visible-Induced IR Fluorescence: Visible:...................................................................................................................UV-Induced IR Fluorescence: Jasmine: Visible: UV-Induced IR Fluorescence:................................................................................Visible-Induced IR Fluorescence: WB was against the stamen tip. Snowdrop: UV-induced Visual Fluorescence:.........................................................................Visible-Induced IR Fluorescence: These imges were WBed on the light part of the petals. Daffodil: Visible:..................................................................................................................UV-Induced Visible Fluorescence: UV-Induced IR Fluorescence:...............................................................................Visible-Induced IR Fluorescence: WB was against the stigma tip Tulip: Visible :...............................................................................................................UV-Induced Visible Fluorescence: UV-Induced IR Fluorescence:.............................................................................Visible-Induced IR Fluorescence: These last two images were WBed on the stigma. And now something completely different – Sugar Cubes: Visible:..............................................................................................................UV-Induced Visible Fluorescence: UV-Induced IR Fluorescence:...........................................................................Visible-Induced IR Fluorescence: Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 What is that second sugar cube? Is that brown sugar? Link to comment
bvf Posted April 10, 2021 Author Share Posted April 10, 2021 What is that second sugar cube? Is that brown sugar? Yes. I was surprised at the difference between white and brown.Perhaps that's why the Rolling Stones thought so highly of it. Link to comment
dabateman Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 These photos are excellent. Oh and Bernard, Rolling stone's Brown sugar is not what you think.Time for you to carefully read the lyrics. Link to comment
colinbm Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Fantastic results Bernard.Fascinating are the different fluorescence in IR with each wave bans used.......seems it is never ending...... Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now