Jump to content
UltravioletPhotography

Peacock feather


Recommended Posts

I borrowed a feather from a friend who keeps peacocks just to see what they looked like in UV http://www.ultravioletphotography.com/content/index.php?/topic/775-peacock-feather/

 

 

 

 

Visible Light: Pentax K-5 Full Spectrum Modification, Nikon Rayfact PF10545 MF-UV 105 mm f/4.5 lens, Metz 15 MS-1 flash, 1/180 s @ f/16 ISO 200, B+W UV/IR Cut Filter.

post-28-0-55734600-1397198091.jpg

Image Reference: DO52427

 

Ultraviolet Light: Pentax K-5 Full Spectrum Modification, Nikon Rayfact PF10545 MF-UV 105 mm f/4.5 lens, Nikon SB-14 flash, 1/180s @ f/16 ISO 200, Baader UV-Pass Filter.

post-28-0-69857200-1397198121.jpg

Image Reference: DO5430

Link to comment
Did you try varying the incidence angle of the UV illumination? I would surmise the iridescence behaviour changed to some extent.
Link to comment
  • 3 months later...

The iridescence of bird feathers is due to structure not pigmentation, so angle of incidence does matter. Nevertheless, among the many different types of feathers I have shot in the UV, the iridescent sections inevitably reflected little UV.

 

Unlike shot silk, feather (and insect) iridescence is based upon refraction between transparent layers and air spaces. This was discovered by immersing feathers in water. Once wet the feathers were not iridescent.

 

Just some curious factoids. :)

Link to comment

Does this tell us something about the false UV colors? The visible colors in this case are presumably due to interference effects as in diffraction gratings, where a specific wavelength (hence color) is seen at certain angles of incidence/reflection-refraction. The bright visible yellow-green around the perimeter of the visible pattern appears to become false-UV blue, which is a false-UV color that I see quite frequently in my UV images of Australian native wildflowers. On the other hand, the visible bright blue inner ring of feathers become very pale or almost non-colored in the UV images depending to some extent on the angle of the UV illumination used for the two UV images.

 

All this proves is that there are no "rules" that can be applied to a visible image to guess how it will appear in false-UV.

 

Dave

Link to comment
  • 6 months later...

Enrico,

The paper states "The train of the peacock.... is composed of iridescent structurally coloured eye spots not reflecting in the UV"

 

That statement was based on measurement of the UV-Vis reflection at a point near the base of the eye spot. !!!!

Dave

Link to comment

John,

 

The paper illustrates the point that measuring the UV spectrum of an isolated point on a feather or a flower petal may give an incorrect impression of the bigger picture.

 

Dave

Link to comment
Perhaps you could take three frames with different illumination angles and paste them into the R ,G, and B channels of a destination image. That would give you an (angulochromic?) image. Or you could extract the three hue channels after converting to HCL and paste those back into RGB; that might really give a measure of iridescence as opposed to specularity.
Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...