Jump to content
UltravioletPhotography

SWIR camera setup and some pics


Recommended Posts

(Borrowed from the lime thread.)

 

Andy, how was your SWIR image photographed? My understanding is that CMOS and CCD image sensors are photo blind above 1200 nM.

 

You are correct. The cutoff is actually closer to 1125nm.

 

So the SWIR is photographed using a fluorescent screen that upconverts SWIR photons into NIR photons. Physically, it is the anti-Stokes effect. The converter tube and screen are the CamIR Adapter, which is the same as the Edmund Optics version, which I obtained on eBay. I paid about 12% of Edmund's price!

post-94-0-60434600-1486691417.jpg

post-94-0-97999700-1486691431.jpgpost-94-0-60760200-1486691448.jpg

post-94-0-53309000-1486691464.jpgpost-94-0-89676800-1486693201.jpg

 

(I believe this to be the cheapest SWIR camera setup in existence! ...and it was still too damn expensive. :( )

 

This is with the Cine Velostigmat 25mm/F1.5 (20", F/1.5, ISO1600)

post-94-0-72246300-1486691667.jpg

 

With a Thorlabs 50mm SM1-mount lens (F/2)

post-94-0-99034900-1486691783.jpgpost-94-0-05068500-1486692166.jpg

Link to comment

That certainly is an impressive looking rig!

 

What investigations do you hope to make with this set-up??

Link to comment
Just exploring! I have started already with the limes, as you saw. Anything with water in it seems to go dark, including humans. That's the overriding conclusion so far. I have no idea what else I'll find as I proceed.
Link to comment

You can also use RG1000 stacked with S8612. I know this sounds crazy, but I have seen it done.

I would not have thought it possible, because the sensor is limited to about 1200nm, and the stack transmission is very low,

but with a long exposure I have seen this work the same way. Water is black (dark) with the stack.

I have not tried this myself yet, but I will.

Here is a graph I made showing 3mm thick RG1000, the test I saw used 2mm thick.

 

post-87-0-59080700-1487210858.jpg

Link to comment

That's not possible (at least for the same reasons). Show it to me and I will try to find an explanation, but it's not shortwave infrared! Silicon goes transparent at 1125nm. Water darkens at 1400nm or so.

 

Water has a number of dark regions other than SWIR, however.

Link to comment

It does get a bit darker even in the NIR. This graph is from Wiki:

https://upload.wikim...iquid_water.png

 

But note that the graph is log-log, so it jumps by several orders of magnitude in SWIR.

 

Uploader gave a link to a list of references, and it matches other plots I googled. (By the way, it is important to google LIQUID water...the vapor spectrum is not the same.)

 

Edit: This link has an example with some "dark water" near the very bottom of the page. It does not go as dark as in SWIR, but it is certainly noticeable!

http://www.randombio.com/d90infrared.html

Link to comment
Andy, you are complicating the issue by showing a false color IR image as an example of dark water. That always happens with false color IR water, you have to go higher to remove color from the water.
Link to comment

Yes, I see the correct pic now.

 

Well, I never said it was possible, I only said I had seen it done. ;-)

Here is my test of the same, using the same glass thicknesses as I had seen done, but I don't know the ISO and Aperture used on the test I saw.

Suffice it to say it requires a lot of exposure time and ISO. Not much fun for me. But this shows what I had seen.

This is a 1200nm+/- range, pushed to extremes, nothing more. I used RG1000 2mm thick + S8612 1mm thick (similar to the graph I posted above).

What you are seeing here is upper transmission of the S8612, as much as I can push the sensor. The RG1000 is cutting off the lower transmission of the S8612. At least that's the idea.

I am not endorsing it, I am just testing the idea.

Shot using Kuribayashi 35mm lens, D7000 full spectrum camera, incandescent light, RO/DI water.

 

post-87-0-97707600-1487228909.jpg

Link to comment
Well the spectra I found show the absorption does go up quickly past 1000nm, so it's not surprising in that light (no pun?) that it looks darker. But I don't believe that's really 1200, or if so, it's just BARELY. Like the last two photons in the bucket, so to speak!
Link to comment

Miso bottle

 

Visible (iPhone 6S Plus), 1000nm LP filter (absorption glass from eBay, not sure which glass)

 

SWIR using a modification of the above setup. I have now got an iris, a lens hood lined with Acktar Metal Velvet, and an SWIR BBAR-coated 50mm lens from Thorlabs. The latter increases the transmission quite a lot, enough that I can stop down to F4 now.

 

Main difference seems to be that the miso bottle cap goes from light to dark.

 

post-94-0-94079700-1487404687.jpg

Link to comment

As observed in the last pic, many plastics seem to go dark in SWIR. Look what happens to the plastic tensile test specimen (I think it was HDPE?) in the mug here:

 

post-94-0-05107000-1487404731.jpg

Link to comment

Heh, yes, if I had a piece of silicon!

 

What about sand? Or a chunk of quartz SiO2? Gets you a bit closer to silicon.

Link to comment

Unfortunately, chemical compounds are nothing like their constituent elements. Here is what quartz looks like versus silicon (images from wiki):

post-94-0-29424400-1487783800.jpgpost-94-0-55987700-1487783809.jpg

 

Silicon isn't that expensive, though, so I might just buy a chunk.

Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...