Jump to content
UltravioletPhotography

[Tags] Discussion #3 Now Open. POLL included.


Andrea B.

Tag Questions  

8 members have voted

  1. 1. Have you ever used a Tag to make a search?

    • Yes
      4
    • No
      4
  2. 2. Do you Tag your taggable topics?

    • Always
      3
    • Usually, but occasionally I forget.
      2
    • Sometimes, but only for certain tags I like.
      3
    • Never, tags are a pain.
      0
  3. 3. Are Tags useful on a board index to find topics you like?

    • Yes
      1
    • Sometimes
      7
    • No
      0
  4. 4. Do we need both a Tag and a dedicated section with the same name? Example: People & Portraits section vs. Portrait tag.

    • Yes. That Tag might be needed also outside the dedicated section.
      2
    • Maybe, I'm not sure.
      6
    • No. Why Tag a topic if it fits into a dedicated section?
      0


Recommended Posts

I knew of the Infrared section, now I searched and we have Ultraviolet & Multispectral (is Multispectral Ok together with Ultraviolet? I think yes, at this point), and actually never noticed Fluorescence & Luminescence. It must be because I never did UVIVF or similar.

 

So yes, we have them. I think they are good as they are (apart from Ultraviolet and Multispectral being together if anyone else finds the need to separate them. The thing is "Multispectral" alone wouldn't make much sense to me).

Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...