Jump to content
UltravioletPhotography

Eremophila mackinlayi [Another Specimen]


DaveO

Recommended Posts

Oldfield, D. 2016. Eremophila mackinlayi F. Muell. subsp. mackinlayi (Scrophulariaceae) Flowers photographed in visible and ultraviolet light.

http://www.ultraviol...other-specimen/

 

Maldon, Victoria, Australia

2 November 2016

Australian Native Wildflower as Garden Specimen

 

Comment

 

We had been looking for E. mackinlayi ever since the post of a photograph of a specimen growing in Death Valley http://www.ultraviol...i-desert-pride/ but is not common in plant nurseries which we visited. The flowers on this specimen may be a little old leading to the petal tips being bent back rather than pointed as in the earlier photograph of the US specimen.

 

Visible Light: Nikon D750 Full Spectrum Modification, Nikon Rayfact PF10545 MF-UV 105 mm f/4.5 lens, Metz 15 MS-1 flash, 1/200 s @ f/16 ISO 200, Baader UV/IR Cut Filter.

post-28-0-30831600-1484193251.jpg

Image Reference: DO63613

 

Ultraviolet Light: Nikon D750 Full Spectrum Modification, Nikon Rayfact PF10545 MF-UV 105 mm f/4.5 lens, Nissin Di866 Mark II flash, 1/200s @ f/16 ISO 200, Baader UV-Pass Filter.

post-28-0-79771000-1484193268.jpg

Image Reference: DO63615

 

Ultraviolet Induced Visible Fluorescence: Nikon D750 Full Spectrum Modification, Nikon Rayfact PF10545 MF-UV 105 mm f/4.5 lens with Baader UV/IR Cut Filter, Nichia NCSU033A UV-LED with Baader UV-Pass Filter, 10.0 s @ f/16 ISO 1600.

post-28-0-75659000-1484193299.jpg

Image Reference: DO63617

 

References:

Chinnock, R.J. Eremophila and Allied Genera, Rosenberg, 2007, p. 469.

Boschen, N., Goods, M. and Wait, R. Australia’s Eremophilas – changing gardens for a changing climate, Bloomings Books, 2008, p. 123.

Brown, A. and Buirchell, B. A Field Guide to the Eremophilas of Western Australia, Simon Nevill Publications, 2011, p. 172.

 

Published 12 January 2017

Link to comment

One of the many (?) problems with Eremophila ID is that they occur in many Australian States and the link is only for Western Australia. In fact, the distribution map actually corresponds to both subspecies when you compare it to the maps in Chinnock. The scatter on the west coast is subspecies mackinlayi and the ones further inland are the ones which Chinnock found for subsp. spathulata, described in 1990. I often have this problem when I look at the label on a bought plant and then go to Chinnock to find that the label only describes the nominate species. The third and most recent reference gives this subsp the name Desert Pride as you found it was known in the US, but not in either of the earlier references.

 

Chinnock puts E. mackinlayi in section Hygrophanae which also contains E. hygrophana and E. strongylophylla to which it is closely allied and all three overlap in distribution - so identifying a specimen in the wild is not all that simple!

 

Dave

Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...