Andrea B. Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 I have wanted to run this topic for some time now because I think it is quite useful to keep up with the various applications folks are using to convert and finish their UV/IR files. Conversion apps have multiple tools, but one app does not always have everything we need to polish up our final photos. For example, panos or stacked files usually require an app separate from the basic conversion software. I was thinking that your answers could be numbered and ordered as I have below. Then I can perhaps collate the responses and provide a summary. After you list your apps, then any comments you have about them can follow the list. Multiple answers are of course acceptable. But many of us have lots of conversion apps, so I'm thinking it is not necessary to list every one of them. Provide your 1-4 most often used conversion apps. What app do you use for: 1. Conversion Primary (list your most-used primary converter/s)2. Conversion Secondary (list your often-used secondary converter/s)3. Raw File Analysis4. Sharpening5. Noise Removal6. Stacking (for depth of field)7. Panoramas8. Black & White/Monochrome9. Ingest/Sort/Name10. Viewer11. Other Specialized Tasks As new responses arrive I will update this Summary. SUMMARYLater I will convert the tick count to numbers.Count complete thru Post #15. 1. Primary ConverterACR 1Capture NX2 11Dark Table 1Dcraw 1Iridient Developer 1Lightroom 11Photo Ninja 1111Raw Therapee 1Sony Image Data Converter 1Sony Imaging Edge Suite 1UFraw 1 2. Secondary ConverterACR 1Affinity 1Aftershot/Bibble 1Dark Table 11Iridient Developer 1Nikon Capture NX-D 11Photoscape X 1Photoshop CS6 11Raw Therapee 11Silkypix 1Unnamed linear ARW converter 1 3. Raw File AnalysisRaw Digger 11Dcraw 1Exiftool 11111ImageJ 11 4. SharpeningCapture NX2 1Capture NX-D 1DxO NIK Sharpener Pro3 111Focus Magic 1Iridient Developer 1Lightroom 1Perfect Resize 1Photoshop CS5 11Photoshop CS6 11Raw Therapee 1Smart Deblue 2.3 1Topaz InFocus 1Topaz 11Topaz Details 1Topaz Clarity 1 5. Noise RemovalACR/LR 1Capture NX2 1Capture NX-D 1DxO NIK Define2 11Lightroom 1Neat Image 11Noise Ninja 1Topaz DeNoise 111 6. StackingDeepSkyStacker (astro/time) 1Olympus E-M1 In-camera 1Photoacute 1Photoshop CS5 1Tawbaware Stacker (time stacks) 1Zerene Stacker 11 7. PanoramasHugin 1Lightroom 1Microsoft Image Composite Editor 11Photoshop CS5 1Photoshop CS6 1PTGui 111 8. Black & White/MonochromeCapture NX2 1Capture NX-D 1DxO NIK Silver Efex Pro2 111In-camera 1Photo Ninja 11Photoshop CS5 11Photoshop CS6 1 9. Ingest/Sort/NameBreezeBrowser Pro 1Bulk Rename Utility 1Lightroom 11Photo Mechanic 1Photoshop CS5 1View NX2 1Windows File Explorer 111 10. ViewerBridge 1Custom viewer written by user 1Fast Picture Viewer 11Irfan Viewer 11Lightroom 1Mac Preview 1Photo Mechanic 1View NX2 1Windows Photo Viewer 11 11. Other Specialized TasksSee posts for more info about what tasks are performed.Not counting here, just listing.CornerfixCustom software written by userDxO NIK Color Efex Pro4Hamrick Vue ScanHDR EfexProHoudahGeoMATLABPhotoshopPhotoshop CS5Photoshop CS6Photoshop ElementsPixelbenderView NX2 Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted November 13, 2018 Author Share Posted November 13, 2018 1. Conversion - Photo Ninja, Capture NX22. Conversion - Dark Table, Affinity3. Raw File Analysis - Raw Digger, Dcraw (command line), Exiftool4. Sharpening5. Noise Removal6. Stacking - Zerene Stacker7. Panoramas8. Black & White/Monochrome - Photo Ninja9. Ingest/Sort/Name - Photo Mechanic10. Viewer - Photo Mechanic11. Other Specialized Tasks - Photoshop Elements for labeling and framing, when needed. I have not gotten very far in learning Dark Table or Affinity. As usual there hasn't been time to devote to that. But I need a backup app because I don't think I'm going to be able to rely on Capture NX2 for very much longer. Photo Ninja is a very sweet converter, but has only global adjustments. Link to comment
eye4invisible Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 1. Adobe Lightroom2. Nikon Capture NX-D3. I don't analyse raw files as such4. Adobe Lightroom5. Adobe Lightroom6. I don't do stacking7. Microsoft ICE (primary) and Adobe Lightroom (secondary)8. I don't do B&W very often, if ever. I would probably do it in Adobe Lightroom.9. Adobe Lightroom10. Windows Photo Viewer11. Adobe Photoshop (more advanced HSL tweaking, removal/cloning out of distractions that I couldn't acheive in-camera) Link to comment
OlDoinyo Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 1 Sony Image Data Converter2 I don't know the name, but there is a little utility I have played with that does linear ARW conversions.3 Haven't gotten into this.4 Unsharp Mask, Photoshop CS55 Topaz DeNoise plugin6 I don't do focus stacking--have used Tawbaware Stacker for time stacking7 Haven't gotten into this8 Photoshop CS59 BreezeSystems BreezeBrowser Pro (I like this one a lot.)10 I don't use a separate viewer much11 Photoshop CS5; Pixelbender (IRG processing;) Hamrick VueScan (running film scanners.) Link to comment
Andy Perrin Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 1. Conversion Primary - PhotoNinja2. Conversion Secondary - Photoshop CS6 (when it can set a white balance)3. Raw File Analysis - exiftool4. Sharpening - SmartDeblur 2.3, Photoshop CS65. Noise Removal - Neat Image PS plugin6. Stacking (for depth of field) - n/a7. Panoramas - Hugin, Photoshop CS68. Black & White/Monochrome - PhotoNinja9. Ingest/Sort/Name - PhotoNinja(?) not sure what this one is quite. 10. Viewer - Preview (built in Mac app)11. Other Specialized Tasks - HoudahGeo for geotagging, MATLAB for complex image processing (PCA, ICA, colorizing, making aerochrome-simulations) and dealing with large batches. Link to comment
GaryR Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 1. Sony Imaging Edge suite2. PS CS63. Never needed analysis4. DxO NIK Sharpener Pro 35. DxO NIK Define 26. in-camera on the Olympus E-M17. never do panos (except on iPhone), PTGui would be my choice in Windows.8. DxO NIK Silver Efex Pro 29. Windows File Explorer10. Fast Picture Viewer11. DxO NIK Color Efex Pro 4 > Pro Contrast Link to comment
DaveO Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 1. Conversion from raw to tiff with Photoninja2. Nil3. Nil4. CS55. Noise removal Topaz6. Stacking - almost never CS57. Panoramas - almost never CS58. CS59. CS510. Windows photo viewer for jpgs11. CS5 Link to comment
nfoto Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 What app program do you use for: 1. Conversion Primary: Photo Ninja2. Conversion Secondary:Silkypix, Aftershot, (Bibble rarely)3. Raw File Analysis: (ExifTool)4. Sharpening: Nik5. Noise Removal: Noise Ninja, Nik6. Stacking (for depth of field): Zerene Stacker7. Panoramas: PTGui8. Black & White/Monochrome: Nik9. Ingest/Sort/Name: Various10. Viewer: Own software11. Other Specialized Tasks: Own software, Photoshop Link to comment
Shane Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 I understand the idea of the poll. For me, the most import piece of software is the RAW converter, if it doesn’t do a good job then everything else downline is really not important. There are a growing number of RAW converters and it’s hard to keep up with their pros and cons, even more so, their hidden processing.However, each of us have probably evaluated various RAW processors and settled on one or two based on specific reasons. There are often hidden beneficial, or not so beneficial, features in most RAW converters. Those features become known to experienced users for that specific converter but are not so apparent to someone trying to choose a new RAW converter. In particular, I think the poll could be far more valuable if users indicated what features led them to the choice of their preferred RAW converter or what features turned them away from others. All RAW converter comparisons I have seen are performed by one person and that person cannot be proficient in the use of all of them and therefore most likely unaware of their pitfalls. There is an opportunity here to get a collective input on the advantages and pitfalls of the RAW converters. One of the problems today is that the job of a RAW converter has changed. A RAW converter should be just that, conversion of RAW data to 16 bit linear tiff. Today it is bundled with processing features as well. Granted SOME corrections like WB and additional processing is beneficial while in linear 16 bit, however much of what is offered can be better performed in non-linear format. When evaluating a RAW converter it seems appropriate to evaluate it based on it's conversion from RAW data to linear 16 bit i.e. demosiac and interpolation and associated artifacts. For instance, some RAW converters use intermediate colour space during the conversion which, after round tripping, can clip bright colors in a non-recoverable way, even though RAW data was not clipped. Some perform CA correction on the original RAW R G B data planes prior to demosaic and interpolation (Photo Ninja I think is one of them) which is beneficial. So choice of RAW converter may change depending on image source and image destination e.g. simple RAW conversion using LR/ACR for internet or complex combined multiple methods for critical output. With all these considerations I am leaning more towards using a converter that just converts with minimal behind the scenes adjustments. Then use software that is designed for a specific purpose e.g. capture deconvolution sharpening or noise reduction. I find these dedicated tools are far more flexible and produce better results, than typically the "do all" RAW converters. The trade off is, complexity and learning curve issues. For internet I would typically just use LR/ACR, for more demanding output the methods below. I’m in the process of re-developing some images for more critical output requirements (technique is often image dependent) using the following:1. RAW conversion to 16 bit linear tiff OUTPUT: Iridient Developer, RawTherapee, Darktable, Dcraw1. RAW conversion to 16 bit non-linear tiff OUTPUT: LR, ACR2. “Critical RAW processing” (WB, Exposure, CA correction): ACR, Iridient Developer, RawTherapee or DarkTable3. RAW File Analysis: Rawdigger, Exiftool, ImageJ (thanks for reminding me)4.Capture (Deconvolution) Sharpening: Focus Magic, Topaz InFocus, Iridient or Rawtherapee 4. Creative Sharpening: Nik, Topaz, CS6 tools, Topaz Details, Topaz Clarity4.Output Sharpening (native resolution): CS6, Focus Magic, Topaz tools4. Output Sharpening (upsizing): Perfect Resize, (checking out QImage and A.I. Gigapixel)5. Capture Noise Removal: NeatImage, ACR/LR Chroma NR6. Stacking: Serene Stacker7. Panoramas: leaning towards PTGui8. B&W: Silver Efex Pro, or custom CS6 conversion.9. Ingest/Sort/Name: LR610. Viewer: FastRawViewer, LR, Bridge (opening tiffs in ACR)11. Other Specialized Tools: CS6 Layers, Cornerfix, HDR EfexPro Sorry if this is too much but this is a personal issue I am heavily and currently involved in for the purpose of finding the best process method for specific types of images, landscape, fur and feathers, infrared, B&W, UV, nightscape, fluorescence etc.. Link to comment
dabateman Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 Shane,Your comments are very valuable. I think the why is much more important than the what.I am a software junkie. And have tried most but still haven't fully settled on a tight work flow. Thus why I have now about 12 years of digital images I need to correctly sort, edit and finish actually printing. Typically I am lazy and just push out the in camera jpeg with no edits or resized in Infran viewer to post here.Thus I have put a hold on buying any new software until I finally lock this down. A project for 2019. I have bought lightzone, now free, Affinity photo, lightroom v3, Capture one v6, DXO v8, full Topaz package back in 2011, now out of date, photoacute and HDR software. I will probably shift to using Afinity, Rawtherapee and photoscape X.But what I currently use is: 1. Conversion Primary: UFraw2. Conversion Secondary: Photoscape X3. Raw File Analysis: Image j4. Sharpening: Topaz5. Noise Removal: Topaz6. Stacking: photoacute7. Panoramas: haven't yet8. Black & White/Monochrome: In camera9. Ingest/Sort/Name: Windows file browser10. Viewer: Infran viewer Why these choices are that its fast. The output from UFraw is great for four thirds cameras and a wavelet function can be applied. Photoscape X also has a lot of interesting features and a good printing module.I hate not having folder access to my files. So not a fan of lightroom or dark table. Link to comment
Shane Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 I hate not having folder access to my files. So not a fan of lightroom or darktable Not sure what you mean.I have used LR since LR2 and have full folder access to my files. In addition, my RAW files (along with xmp sidecar files) and folders are distinguished in such a way that if LR vanished from the planet I could still search on files and folders using DOS. Having lived through the days of database transitions, Lotus 123, DBase, Excel, Access, Paradox, etc it's a "survivalist" approach. Link to comment
dabateman Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 Not sure what you mean.I have used LR since LR2 and have full folder access to my files. In addition, my RAW files (along with xmp sidecar files) and folders are distinguished in such a way that if LR vanished from the planet I could still search on files and folders using DOS. Having lived through the days of database transitions, Lotus 123, DBase, Excel, Access, Paradox, etc it's a "survivalist" approach.When you open lightroom or dark table you have to import all the photos you want to work on and are given the catalogue option. I hate this as I sort my photos on my computer in folders with date_camera_event. So in Capture one or Rawtherapee in left panel, I can see everything. This is not how lightroom works. Link to comment
Shane Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 I sort my photos on my computer in folders with date_camera_eventYes I do something similar....of course you have to import them to work on them but you only import the location of your files and folders in LR. I sort and move my files and folders all the time through LR. My "collection" of images is in "my folder system" on an external drive and utilizes "my file naming structure". I used to name files externally in BRU before importing into LR but LR can now name them exactly how I want. I can also see my folder structure in the left hand panel under folders. So I'm still not getting what you mean other than having to import the "location" of the files and folders. I'm using LR6....maybe there is something different in how LR CC functions?If there is one thing I don't like about LR, with regards to files, is that not all of the LR edits can be written to the xmp sidecar files, so if LR totally bombs along with its backups, then some info is lost, but not RAW edits, keywords, and ratings. Andrea.... didn't mean to sidetrack the poll posting....feel free to move it. Link to comment
otoien Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 1. Conversion Primary: CNX22. Conversion Secondary: CNX-D, Looking at RawTherapee3. Raw File Analysis: (ExifTools for metadata)4. Sharpening: CNX2/CNX-D5. Noise Removal: CNX2/CNX-D6. Stacking: DeepSkyStacker for astro photo/time stacks.7. Panoramas: Microsoft Image Composite Editor8. Black & White/Monochrome: rarely, CNX2/CNX-D.9. Ingest/Sort/Name: Ingest: Windows Explorer. Name: Bulk Rename Utility; Sort (and tag): ViewNX210. Viewer: Irfanview/ViewNX211. Other Specialized Tasks: Adding IPTC info: ViewNX2 Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted November 15, 2018 Author Share Posted November 15, 2018 ...the poll could be far more valuable if users indicated what features led them to the choice of their preferred RAW converter or what features turned them away from others... My primary raw converters are Capture NX-2 and Photo Ninja.Why you ask? :D My converted cameras are usually Nikons, so early on (in 2007) I learned to use Nikon's Capture converters because the NX white balance tool worked well for UV photos at a time when Adobe ACR did not. I came to love the Capture tools - particularly the color control points and the feathered brush - because they were so fast and so accurate and because layers and masks were not needed. What was taking me 30 minutes or so in the Photoshop I was using at that time (don't recall which one) took half the time or less in Capture. Eventually I let Photoshop go completely. But I do have the very much simpler (and "dumber") Photoshop Elements for labeling and framing and other simple graphics tasks not found in the typical raw converter. Another nice thing was that Capture could write directly into a protected area of the raw NEF file so there was no clutter of sidecars to keep track of. Now I'm hanging onto Capture NX2 by a rapidly fraying hair. I have to maintain an old OS on my Macbook to run NX2 and that's becoming untenable. I'm losing support on too many other programs. So it is Time to Move On. Maybe I'll try the new DxO programs which have incorporated the old NIK color points. On the old Nikongear (from 10 years ago or so) one of the members was a tester for the Bibble foto converter. We heard all these good things about Bibble and started to use it. Bibble had an excellent click-white balance tool and other nice easy processing tools so I used it a lot for UV/IR work (in addition to Capture). Eventually Bibble was sold off and disappeared (apparently) into Aftershot which I didn't like. So in searching around for other interesting converters I found Photo Ninja. What fun I've had with Photo Ninja! I learned that if I'm careful to shoot well while making the photo then I don't really need extensive "processing" at all. A few tweaks of the global sliders in Photo Ninja and you have a very nicely done conversion. Now my processing time is even less than what it was in Capture -- with one exception, sharpening. Photo Ninja's sharpening and details tools can only be applied globally and that's not so great because it tends to sharpen/detail any noise and other areas which are best left soft. But popping the foto into another app for sharpening after its conversion in PN has not been too much of a pain. Best things about Photo Ninja: It is so simple.Easy creation of color profile.The detail slider is a wonder.So far I cannot completely recreate the detail slider (an apparent wide radius kind of "sharpening"?) in other apps. The highlight and shadow sliders tie for being wonder #2.At least for Nikon cams which have lots of highlight headroom and liftable shadows. No HDR ever needed with a D750/810/850. Just run the file through PN and polish up local details as needed in PS or wherever. The typically unexplored Color Enhancement patches in PN can perform some very interesting tweaks. I should perhaps try to write up some of the trickery I've figured out for those patches. Now that I have written this I see that I have sought Simplicity and Good Click-White Balance in the photo apps which I use. OK, that is good to know. Link to comment
dabateman Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Now that I have written this I see that I have sought Simplicity and Good Click-White Balance in the photo apps which I use. OK, that is good to know. This is why I still jump to Ufraw. Now that a new version of dcraw has been released, I emailed the creater. Hopefully an update will incorporate all the new cameras. Link to comment
nfoto Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 I might add that Photo Ninja has a quite useful batch processing capability that makes running huge amounts of RAW files through to get TIFs for stacking a breeze. It also has a very elementary yet powerful file manager tool that I actually use a lot. Link to comment
Shane Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 When I look at available RAW software I separate each program into:1) RAW Conversion e.g. demosaic and interpolation algorithms, chromatic aberration correction, colour management, numerical data handling, etc2) RAW Critical Linear Adjustments e.g. WB, exposure adjustment, capture sharpening 3) RAW Processing e.g. Contrast, Saturation, Clarity, Curves, Spot Removal, Alignment etc4) RAW Utility e.g. batch processing, file management, file browsing, keywording etc 1 and 2 are the most important, 4 is valuable, and 3 is really only convenience useful for non critical images. Much of 3 can be better accomplished by Photoshop or other dedicated tools. I haven't really found one RAW program that (to me) is perfect, so often times, it requires combining several different programs for difficult or critical images, or possibly one program for specific types of images. What I would find most valuable is information that fills in the blanks for #1 (primarily) and 2, for all the different RAW software available. For example, what demosiac/interpolation algorithms are available, does it implement pre-demosiac chromatic aberration correction, can you customize demosaic/interpolation for monochrome conversion or IR 830nm, does it use intermediate colour space, can it output linear RAW (without intermediate colour space) etc. Tracking down this info for the available programs is often difficult unless you are a dedicated user and have stumbled across it in literature or experience. One very important bit of information often left out is the software version. With Adobe ACR/LR this is critical as different Process Versions exist e.g. PV2003, PV2010 and PV2012. Adjustment sliders labelled the same, often don't perform the same between versions. Also adjustment methods e.g. sharpening may improve with software versions. In addition, a better understanding of what the manufacturer does to the "RAW" data before outputting the RAW file, e.g. Nikon WB pre-conditioning, dark current subtraction etc, and possible ways to circumvent them through hacking e.g. Nikon Hackers Firmware Patch. PS Spellcheck keeps changing demosaic to demoniac, perhaps it is more appropriate. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted November 18, 2018 Author Share Posted November 18, 2018 Shane, thanks for further detail about raw conversion tasks. There is SO much I do not know about raw conversion. So I'm thinking that I will try to look first at demosaicing and what "well-known" algorithms are available and what might be the pros/cons of each. On a side note: Sometimes as owners/admins of a photo website, we can ask developers questions about conversion software and actually get an answer. Although quite often the answer to questions is "that's proprietary". (As if someone could not eventually figure it out anyway.) Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted November 18, 2018 Author Share Posted November 18, 2018 Update: So I dove in and started with the simple stuff - the nearest neighbor algorithm. Within 15 minutes I was looking for my old copy of Knuth to read up on the post office problem. Whereupon.....I realized that perhaps I was overdoing it just a bit and did not need to recreate the optimization course (now mostly forgotten) which I once took at Bell Labs. Need a slightly higher-level approach to my personal review of demosaicing. :blink: Link to comment
Shane Posted November 18, 2018 Share Posted November 18, 2018 Got me thinking about re-visiting Nikon RAW software after abandoning it many years ago. Some hard questions about Capture NX2 and Capture NX-D:1) do you know if it is possible to output a linear tiff from either of these two programs?2) does it convert to an intermediate colour space and if so what is it?3) does the new version of NX-D respect a UniWB setting?4) does the new version of NX-D respect an image with a linear curve that has been previously uploaded to the camera?5) can you select an output profile such as ProPhotoRGB with a gamma 1?6) does it use an internal "camera" profile that is truly neutral?7) is Chromatic Aberration performed prior to demosaic?8) any idea what demosaic algorithm it uses?9) we know Nikon DSLR will perform NR under some circumstances even when turned off, does NX2 and NX-D perform behind the scenes NR and/or Sharpening (non-AA vs AA sensors)?10) I saw a brief comment on NX-D providing a Diffraction Compensation feature, any comments as to how well it functions? Andrea - what version of NX are you using and on which mac OS, and any issues?I'm running El Cap 10.11.6 and it looks like it is possible to install NX2 Ver 2.4.6 (up to D800/D800E) and NX-D Ver 1.5 (all models) which also includes U-point technology (again). Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted November 19, 2018 Author Share Posted November 19, 2018 My NX2 version 2.4.7 is running on the old Mountain Lion. No problems with running NX2 on 10.8.5. But obviously I have problems with upgrading other apps and cannot use any apps which were built on newer OS versions. "This cannot go on very much longer", she has said for the last 4 years or so. Let me be sure I understand: A linear TIF has had no gamma applied. That is, gamma = 1.0. Yes?If so, then NX2 will not output a linear 16-bit TIF, only a "normal" 16-bit TIF. In NX2 you can assign any rgb which is available on your computer to be your working space and also assign it to the output file (NEF or TIF). ProPhotoRGB, for example, is my working space. Had to find it and upload it myself because it was not part of NX2. I think I do not understand why you would want to output the linear 16-bit TIF.Isn't such a file kind of dark, without form and void? I have never used NX-D after my first trial of it. It was so terrible and very hiccup-y. Sorry I cannot offer any answers for NX-D. Link to comment
Shane Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 A linear TIF has had no gamma applied. That is, gamma = 1.0. Yes? Yes In NX2 you can assign any rgb which is available on your computer to be your working space and also assign it to the output file (NEF or TIF). ProPhotoRGB, for example, is my working space. Had to find it and upload it myself because it was not part of NX2. This possibly infers that NX2 CAN output a linear tiff. In photoshop, change the gamma for ProPhotoRGB from 1.8 to 1.0. Then place the ProPhotoRGB gamma 1 working space where NX2 can find it. Select it in NX2 and theoretically it should output the file as a linear tiff. If you try it let me know what you find. Linear tiff can easily be converted to non-linear tiff which is typically, but not always most appropriate. Converting from non-linear back to linear tiff is not without some loss.Outputting linear tiff from a RAW converter e.g. NX-D (if it was possible) provides a high quality Nikon RAW demosaic (after all, they do not have to reverse engineer their own product like Adobe does) that can then be deconvolution sharpened (always preferable before applying gamma) and passed to another RAW converter e.g. ACR and there, use the benefit of RAW "processes" like chroma NR, Exposure compensation etc. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted November 20, 2018 Author Share Posted November 20, 2018 I would try, but I do not have Big Photoshop, only Little Photoshop (Elements). Thus cannot change any gammas. Link to comment
Shane Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 I could send you 3 icc profiles with gamma 1 through your email when I get back. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now