Andrea B. Posted June 23, 2015 Share Posted June 23, 2015 Ultraviolet As a Component of Flower Reflections and the Colour Perception of Hymenopteraby L. Chittka, A. Shmida, N. Troje, R Menzel12 August 1993Vision Research 34:1489-1508 573 flower species (1063 "petals") were measured and grouped.Orange, brown or near black flowers were not included. Notation:+ = reflecting- = absorbing/ = intermediate (i.e., either moderately reflecting or moderately absorbing) For easier grouping:Blue = 400-500 nmGreen = 500-600 nmRed = 600-700 nm -UV-B+G+R [16.6%]UV-absorbingHuman: yellowBee: greenAbsorbent between 300-480 nm, sharp step @520 nm, reflects beyond that.Example: Lotus corniculatus +UV-B+G+R [13.1%]UV-reflectingHuman: yellowBee: UV-greenExample: Senecio verralis -UV+B-G+R & -UV+B /G+R [25.2%]UV-absorbingHuman: blue with a red component, purple, pinkBee: blue to cyanExample: Polemonium caerulum & Knautia arvensis +UV+B-G+R [10%]UV-reflectingHuman: violet, purpleBee: UV-blueSimilar to preceding group but having a conspicuous minimum around 550 nmand shortwave reflection from 400 down to 370 nm or more.Example: Pulmonaria obscura -UV-B-G+R [2.8%]UV-absorbingHuman: redBee: uncoloured, minimal to no excitation of bee visual receptors.Absorbs between 300-590 nm. Steep slope around 610 - 620 nm.Usually hummingbird pollinated.Example: Justicia rizzinii +UV-B-G+R [1.6%]UV-reflectingHuman: redBee: UVExample: Papaver rhoeas -UV+B+G+R [19.7%]UV-absorbingHuman: whiteBee: cyanThe step between shortwave absorption and longwave reflection occurs around 410 nm.Example: Berteroa incana -UV /B+G+R [3.8%]UV-absorbingHuman: pale yellow, creamBee: cyan to greenShoulder in blue and strong reflection in green & yellow.Example: Tillandsia incunda +UV+B+G+R [.9%]UV-reflectingHuman: whiteBee: uncoloured, almost equal stimulation of all bee receptors, difficult for bees to detect, ["bee-white"?].UV reflection extends down to 350 or more.Example: Asphodelus aestivus /UV /B /G-R [.8%] and 100% of green leaves.Moderately UV-absorbing/reflectingHuman: green, in humans the R-G opponent channel signals more on the green side.Bee: uncoloured, no rapid transitions over the bee's visual spectrum, ["bee-grey"?]Example: Green leaves [i've forgotten why this doesn't add up to 100%] ************************** 41% of the flowers in the study are [+UV+B+G+R], [-UV+B+G+R], [-UV-B+G+R], [-UV-B-G+R]human: white/white/yellow/redbee: uncoloured/cyan/green/uncoloured 15% of the flowers in the study are[+UV-B+G+R], [+UV-B-G+R]human: yellow/redbee: UV-green/UV 35% of the flowers in the studyhuman: violet, blue, purple, pinkAnd have step between 600 - 650 nm and an approximate Gaussian peak between 380 - 450 nm. There are no pure UV (black) flowers that are UV-reflective [+U-B-G-R]. There are no cyan flowers [+B+G-R], i.e., no flowers absorbing in the red domain. UV-dark is more common in the flowers than UV-bright. The UV reflection is always lower than in other parts of the spectrum. Generally no reflection functions change more than 3 times over the range 300-700 nm. Sharp changes in spectral reflectances cluster around 400, 500 & 600 nm. [+UV+B+G+R] white UV-reflective flowers are predominately visited by nocturnal mothsbecaiuse these flowers maximize total reflection for those signal receiversto whom intensity is meaningful. Bees lack coding channels for intensity. (Back then. Has this changed?) ************************** UV-DarkHuman Beeblue, purple, pink blue, cyanred uncolouredyellow greencream cyanwhite cyan UV-BrightHuman Beeblue, purple, violet UV-bluered UVyellow UV-greenwhite uncoloured Link to comment
msubees Posted June 23, 2015 Share Posted June 23, 2015 Thank you, Andrea! I need to read this paper. I have "known" Lars (first author) for about a year now on facebook ;) Here let us see if it makes sense with real photos. I thought all the Potentillas (all assumed to be P. fruticosa) were totally black under UV, but today I increased the exposure quite a bit, and now I saw the white cultivar actually is not as dark as the pink or yellow one. 1. Visual. http://ww2.beetography.com/var/resizes/UV/DSC01451_v2.jpg?m=1435077747 2. UV. After adjusting exposure in the old photoshop (I do not see something similar to "level" in Photoninja to adjust the curve), now I see the white is not as dark as the other two.http://ww2.beetography.com/var/resizes/UV/DSC01452_v2.jpg?m=1435077748 3. simulated insect vision (S8612 x 2mm + UG5 X 1.5mm). Is the original white now cyan? a hint of cyan, but not very strong. someone like me almost call it white with a tint of blue/green :DThe original pink is more cyan than the white one?The original yellow is now dark green. so I guess Andrea is always right, and they are also right? :D :D http://ww2.beetography.com/var/resizes/UV/DSC01455_v1.jpg?m=1435077750%20 Link to comment
nfoto Posted June 23, 2015 Share Posted June 23, 2015 A general notice is that estimates of proportions within a population demand proper random sampling strategies. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted June 23, 2015 Author Share Posted June 23, 2015 Zach, these are looking good! Andrea certainly is not always right!!! I am often wrong. But I try to stay alert and correct the errors. ;) Let's work it through. But keep in mind that I do not know the actual spectral characteristics of these flowers. I am simply parsing what I see and then referring to those Chittka groups (which very well may have been altered in some ways since the papers after gathering additional data). yellow Potentilla:-UV-B+G+Rbee greenThe yellow flower foto shows bee green. :D white Potentilla:-UV+B+G+R-UV /B+G+Rbee cyan or bluish-greenThe white flower foto shows cyan-ish colour. :D pink Potentilla:Pink is a tough one. Is the Pink simply a desaturated magenta? or is it desaturated red?Here are a couple of samples. Desat magenta on the left & desat red on the right.I tend to call both these colours pink when seen separately.So we would have something like this for the pink flower.-UV+B /G+R or -UV+B+g+R (I like to use small letters to indicate less reflectivity.)This would be for the bee between bee blue and bee cyan. More blue than green.or-UV /B /G +R or -UV+b+g+RIf it is true that bees do not code for intensity, then the blue & green signals must be strong enough to stimulate the bee's blue & green receptors past some threshold (unknown to me) to get cyan. The pink flower foto shows cyan-ish colour. :D So I would say that you pretty much nailed it within the usual constraints we must apply:1. We cannot be completely accurate or precise with photographic equipment being used outside its specification.2. Our filters/sensors/lenses/etc have not been measured/calibrated.3. Software rendering is app dependent. No two converting/editing apps produce the same foto.4. We are only estimating/guessing the spectral reflectivity of the flowers.5. Other. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted June 23, 2015 Author Share Posted June 23, 2015 A general notice is that estimates of proportions within a population demand proper random sampling strategies. Covered under "Other". :D :D ;)I did not make any notes about their sampling, but I have the paper here on my laptop and will try to look it up later. I sampled (in another sense) Zach's bee vision foto. Obviously a jpeg has wandered away from the original colour space (and so forth and so on). But I was curious anyway as to how those colours were reading. Here is a little sample (in another sense). On the pink Potentilla I probably selected too bright a spot. This (so-called) "sampling" I did in Photoshop to "measure" the colours was simply done to satisfy my curiosity. I doubt there is anything scientific going on in my sampling strategy. :D :P In the cyan flowers, there is a little more green than blue.Ratios are G:B of 1.26::1 for the pink and 1.17::1 for the white. Both these are very close to cyan. Zach, what you are noticing about the white flower in its bee version is that it is brighter than the pink flowers in their bee version. Link to comment
nfoto Posted June 23, 2015 Share Posted June 23, 2015 You misread my meaning, Andrea. You referred to the flowers themselves, my comment was to the estimated percentages of colour groups. Spatial sampling of the flower structure must be pretty difficult to carry out in a strict sense, with flower petals/corollas being so massively spatially variable as demonstrated by photography. Thus one actually (unknowingly?) creates a major aliasing of any pattern, unless spectral data are sampled with a high frequency. Link to comment
msubees Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 Does this mean, if we map the colors of the three cultivars in our and bee color space, that they will be much closer in bee's system? They definitely looked more different to our eyes. Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted June 24, 2015 Author Share Posted June 24, 2015 Zach, I don't know. There may be some info in the research papers on bee/insect vision. I've read in one paper that bees have no coding for intensity/brightness. But I'm not sure all researchers agree on that. I have not read enough of the research to take a stand on this. (And, of course, this isn't my field anyway. )Dig into the research papers and see what you find! Let us know. Link to comment
msubees Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 I got an impression that they must be closer in bee vision. I think Lars might have published something somewhere. OK, for application, please guess which one of the following is a red, white and pink begonia. this is in UV. I think now my UV blues will be similar to Andreas :(http://ww2.beetography.com/var/resizes/UV/DSC01500_v1.jpg?m=1435240535 Link to comment
msubees Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 You got one right! If I tell you which one is right, then you will know the answer to all three. Will wait for one day to post the bee vision one (which will gave more answer, perhaps), then finally the visual one. It seems there are no hard rules here :( Last time I did one, also of Begonia, but with much larger flowers, which had 4 colors (a yellow). and I got totally different results:http://ww2.beetography.com/var/resizes/UV/P1100838-S.JPG?m=1404503887 http://ww2.beetography.com/var/resizes/UV/P1100839-S.JPG?m=1404503888 White - red - pink ? Link to comment
Andrea B. Posted June 25, 2015 Author Share Posted June 25, 2015 It seems there are no hard rules here :( Creating colour profiles for both Visible and UV will help you attain consistent results. Link to comment
msubees Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Yes, profiles will make colors more constant. but I do not think the begonias last year (by G5) and this year (Nex7) are due to camera or processing differences. Mainly due to plant differences, I think. here is the bee vision version. Now perhaps you know which one is red, at least. http://ww2.beetography.com/var/resizes/UV/DSC01499_v1.jpg?m=1435240533It seems there are no hard rules here :( Creating colour profiles for both Visible and UV will help you attain consistent results. Link to comment
msubees Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 the answer! happy friday...it would be interesting to see if the two species (?) had totally different pigments (e.g. red in the small begonia was uv reflective, and more absorptive for the larger ones taken last year). artificial breeding might be selecting very different pigments in different varieties... http://ww2.beetography.com/var/resizes/UV/DSC01497_v1.jpg?m=1435256032 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now